Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Marriage amendment

Bush said the following during tonight's State of the Union address:
"Because marriage is a sacred institution and the foundation of society, it should not be re-defined by activist judges. For the good of families, children, and society, I support a constitutional amendment to protect the institution of marriage."
1. State of the Union Transcript

Marriage is a sacred institution? Secular marriages are commonplace; divorce rates are at record highs. What is the threat that same-sex marriages pose to our society?

Furthermore, is the president implying that non-traditional marital practices are a threat to the "foundation of society"? Is hearing "Mr. and Mr. Smith" or "Mrs. and Mrs. Johnson" that blasphemous? Will modern society crumble upon hearing such things?

But more importantly, what business does a clarification of marriage have being enacted in the form of a constitutional amendment? Aren't controversial social issues best left up to the community and state respectively?

No comments:

Post a Comment