Philosophy as an ultimatum is a denial of the right for future generations to want to say something profound about the world, to color it with their own experiences and judgments.
What do we get out of such a doctrine? An advancing culture that must continually reject all that comes before it. A generation that says something, and another that says, "You're wrong... but perhaps..." and yet another generation that rejoins "no."
It's my view that one should be skeptical of religious beliefs that establish human-to-human hierarchies. Divine-to-human seems perfectly fine; it's the others that are dangerous. Religion originates in the individual—"subjectivity is truth"; "the crowd is untruth"—in subjectivity's relationship to another.
Deterministic rules, etc. -- The question of what these rules are is scientific. The question of why there are rules is religious.
"Is the space pope reptilian?"
"Culture is an observance. Or at least it presupposes an observance." —LW
The essay at hand is almost subterranean. (Deep.)
Kierkegaard is one of the few thinkers I would describe as overwhelmingly intelligent.
If I don't find a motivation beyond the grade in the course of a class, I'm not going to go very far.
Listening to the new Mars Volta albums is like waiting for a bus. A few beautiful moments in a sea of overindulgence.
"Be one of those upon whom nothing is lost." —W. James
Think about the following: the mark of good writing is in the artistry, wisdom, or significance to be gleaned.
Cheese is one of humankind's greatest achievements.
No comments:
Post a Comment