Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Intelligent design unconstitutional in Penn.

"Both defendants and many of the leading proponents of ID make a bedrock assumption which is utterly false. Their presupposition is that evolutionary theory is antithetical to a belief in the existence of a supreme being and to religion in general."

--District Judge John Jones


1. Excerpts from US judge's ruling against intelligent design
2. Darwin Victorious
3. Religion & Science: Can’t We Get Along?

No comments:

Post a Comment